home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: khms.westfalen.de!kai
- Date: 13 Mar 1996 18:11:00 +0200
- From: kai@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
- Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.std.c
- Message-ID: <64l0LFYEcsB@khms.westfalen.de>
- References: <4gum82$14v4@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
- <4hfecl$33t@solutions.solon.com>
- <KANZE.96Mar5131710@slsvgqt.lts.sel.alcatel.de>
- <danpop.826218405@rscernix> <KANZE.96Mar8125719@gabi.gabi-soft.fr>
- Subject: Re: Coding Standards are ignorant
- X-Newsreader: CrossPoint v3.1 R/C435
- Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding?
- X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail.
- Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail.
- X-US-Congress: Moronic fucks.
-
- kanze@gabi-soft.fr (J. Kanze) wrote on 08.03.96 in <KANZE.96Mar8125719@gabi.gabi-soft.fr>:
-
- > We didn't miss it, we just don't agree:-). Except for a relatively few
- > people, a program with `void main()' is a legal ANSI C program, too.
- > IMHO, talking about ANSI C is about the same as writing `void main()';
- > it generally works, and most people/compilers will know what you are
- > talking about, but that doesn't make it right.
-
- You misspelt "it generally doesn't work, and most compilers won't know
- what you are talking about".
-
- It's people who usually don't check return values that don't notice that
- it doesn't work.
-
- Kai
- --
- Current reorgs: news.groups, news.admin.net-abuse.* (see nana.misc)
- Internet: kai@khms.westfalen.de
- Bang: major_backbone!khms.westfalen.de!kai
- http://www.westfalen.de/private/khms/
-